Case Study

Industrial Equipment Lender: Article 9 Sale

A secured lender repossessed logistics-industry collateral and used a public Article 9 sale to recover nearly the full loan balance without litigation.

April 7, 2026
Nationally marketed Article 9 sale after repossession
Public Article 9 collateral sale

Company Context

Industry

Equipment Finance / Logistics

Company Type

Defaulted borrower with repossessed industrial collateral

Process Design

Timeline

Nationally marketed Article 9 sale after repossession

Value Realization

40% above appraised value

Key Facts

Borrower Industry

Logistics

Process

Public Article 9 sale

Marketing Scope

National

Sale Price

40% above appraised value

Loan Recovery

95%

Outcome

The lender recovered 95% of the outstanding loan balance and avoided the cost of litigation.

Executive Summary

CMBG coordinated a public Article 9 sale for a private lender after a logistics borrower defaulted. The assets were marketed nationally, sold for 40% above appraised value, and generated a 95% recovery on the outstanding loan balance.

Case Study Section

Situation

A private lender had repossessed collateral from a defaulted borrower operating in the logistics industry and needed a recovery path that could be executed quickly without drifting into expensive litigation.

The practical challenge was not just taking possession of the assets. It was running a sale process that would be commercially reasonable, compliant under Article 9, and robust enough to maximize value rather than simply dispose of the collateral at a discount.

Case Study Section

Key Facts

The sale outcome turned on disciplined process design, broad buyer outreach, and a collateral strategy that treated the assets as marketable equipment rather than distressed leftovers.

Borrower Industry

Logistics

Process

Public Article 9 sale

Marketing Scope

National

Sale Price

40% above appraised value

Loan Recovery

95%

Case Study Section

Why Article 9 Was the Right Remedy

The lender did not need a full court-supervised insolvency process to enforce its rights. What it needed was a defensible foreclosure remedy that allowed it to liquidate the collateral efficiently while preserving competitive tension in the sale.

A public Article 9 sale offered that structure. It allowed the lender to move without the cost profile of litigation or bankruptcy while still creating a transparent process around notice, marketing, and sale execution.

  • Used a secured-creditor remedy that could move faster than a court process.
  • Created a public sale framework rather than a private disposal with limited market exposure.
  • Positioned the collateral for stronger recovery through broader buyer competition.

Case Study Section

The Process

CMBG coordinated the Article 9 sale from notice through closing. The work included the procedural requirements that make the sale defensible, but just as importantly, the commercial work needed to create real buyer interest.

  • Prepared compliant sale notices and coordinated process timing.
  • Marketed the repossessed assets nationally to reach a wider buyer pool.
  • Managed buyer diligence, information flow, and sale logistics.
  • Coordinated closing mechanics so the process could move from repossession to recovery without unnecessary friction.

Case Study Section

Result

The sale closed at a price that exceeded appraised value by 40%, materially improving the economic outcome for the lender relative to a narrower or less disciplined process.

The lender recovered 95% of the outstanding loan balance and avoided the cost and delay of litigation, producing a faster and cleaner enforcement outcome.

Case Study Section

Key Takeaways

  • A secured creditor remedy can still produce strong value when the process is marketed broadly and run with discipline.
  • Appraisal value is not the ceiling when collateral is exposed to the right buyer pool.
  • Article 9 remedies work best when legal compliance and sale execution are treated as one integrated process.
  • Avoiding litigation is valuable only if the out-of-court process is still transparent, defensible, and recovery-focused.

Note: The case studies presented on this site are anonymized, composite illustrations. Out of respect for client confidentiality, no case describes a specific engagement; names, industries, financial figures, and identifying details have been altered or generalized. Each finding, intervention, and outcome described, however, is representative of work CMBG has executed or is qualified to execute.